Which of the following is NOT a test for course of action?

In the context of evaluating potential courses of action, the relevant tests typically include feasibility, acceptability, and distinguishability. Each of these tests serves a distinct purpose in determining the viability of a course of action.

Feasibility assesses whether a proposed action can be accomplished given available resources, time constraints, and technological limits. Acceptability evaluates whether the action is morally and ethically justifiable and aligns with organizational values, as well as stakeholder expectations. Distinguishability examines whether the proposed action stands out from alternative options and offers unique benefits.

Relevancy, while important in broader decision-making contexts, is not specifically listed as one of the fundamental tests for a course of action. Instead, it serves more as an overarching guideline that pertains to various aspects of analysis, rather than being a formal criterion like the others. Therefore, identifying this as an option suggests it does not fit into the established framework used for evaluating courses of action.